Grand Complications

Personally, I would be very happy with the 5270 and I much prefer it over a Nautilus on a strap. At least there are two holes so that the dial is balanced. I think perpetual dials look worse where there is just one hole for the leap year indicator, like o

The nautilus is just too thin for my taste.. The grey on the 5270 was very nice but the 2 portholes become too jarring

So many novelties to like/love, including the fabulous automaton, the ground breaking new Celestial (both in complications and design), daring and beautiful new dial colors (eg the lacquered dial 5270Ps), 5227G salmon, exceptionally sporty and beautiful b

So many novelties to like/love, including the fabulous automaton, the ground breaking new Celestial (both in complications and design), daring and beautiful new dial colors (eg the lacquered dial 5270Ps), 5227G salmon, exceptionally sporty and beautiful b

Dear fellow Patek lovers, With reference to the topic matter, please could anyone let me know what is the correct lift angle for the 5170 & 5270 (as they share the same base movement) ? I’m doing some Timegrapher measurements and it would be great to have

Enter text

innovations continue while balanced with more colorful dials and straps to bring in younger collectors. The average age of Patek collectors is around mid to late 40s. As Cubitus was created with a younger crowd in mind, I see this strategy continuing step

Just for reference,my wrist measurement is 17- & from my prospective the size of the watch is not overpowering & the size is probably necessary considering what is around the base movement to make it work & at the same time having not to cramp the view of

even if the case is probably too large for my wrist. That said, I consider the new 6105G to be a major release. The modern aesthetic isn't my taste, but it's well made. And, from a horological standpoint, well, it's simply great (for me, at least). Best,